naming conventions Questions

I have a build that outputs various configuration files, some which are very similar but differ based on the attributes of the component they support. Our current naming convention for the configuration files consist of identifying the attributes supported:

Config_Foo_attr1.xml, Config_Foo_attr1_attr2.xml

As our attribute options grow so will the file names. Has anyone else dealt with something similar to this issue?

I'm trying to find an alternative to the option being proposed by those outside of CM. They would like the configuration files to be generated on the fly by a tool based on an operator's input during the download of the component.

Thanks,
pparlow

CMCrossroads is a TechWell community.

Through conferences, training, consulting, and online resources, TechWell helps you develop and deliver great software every day.